Article Review Process

Submitted articles will be reviewed by the Editor. At this stage, the editor will ensure the article's suitability to the focus and scope of the journal, the conformity of the writing format with the guidelines provided, the similarity of the manuscript and the possibility of having major methodological flaws.

After passing the initial stage, the article will be reviewed by two reviewers. The journal applies a double-blind review method where the names, institutions and cities of both reviewers and authors are concealed during the review process.

Evaluation components and indicators The reviewers' assessment is described as follows:
- Title: Effectiveness, specificity, and clarity
- Abstract: Complete and explain the essence of the article.
- Keywords: Describe the core concepts of the article.
- Introduction: Pertinence, originality, relevance of the topic, appropriateness of the important reasons for the research objectives.
- Methods: Accuracy, specification, and clarity.
- Results (Analytical and Synthetic): Analytical acumen.
- Discussion (Interpretation): findings, relevance to interrelated research, and the effect of the scientific contribution of the findings/ideas on the development of science.
- Conclusion: Logical, valid, concise, and clear
- References: Up-to-date level and source of references

Articles will be declared eligible for publication if the author has made improvements in accordance with the suggestions of the reviewers or both reviewers have declared the article acceptable.